Showing posts with label Patrick Wintour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patrick Wintour. Show all posts

Prime minister tells Commons he wants to curb amount of cheap booze but will not explicitly promise unit price change


David Cameron has pledged to stop cheap alcohol being sold in supermarkets but has failed to commit to a minimum unit pricing policy.


The prime minister had been urged to end speculation that the government was poised to abandon plans for a minimum unit price for alcohol.


Cameron told MPs at prime minister's questions in the House of Commons that the government was still examining the results of a consultation on the policy amid mounting speculation that the move he personally championed would be abandoned.


A base price of 45p per unit in England and Wales has been suggested but a number of cabinet ministers, including the home secretary, Theresa May, have made clear they harbour doubts.


Medical chiefs urged Cameron to be courageous and take a "once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to save lives, save the country money". But Tory critics said minimum pricing was a "blunderbuss" policy that would penalise responsible low-income drinkers while doing nothing to tackle problem drinking.


Cameron's stance was ridiculed by the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, who joked: "Could the prime minister tell us, is there anything he could organise in a brewery?"


Cameron was confronted in the Commons by the Tory MP Sarah Wollaston – a former GP – who said abandoning minimum pricing would "critically undermine future efforts".


He told her: "There is a problem with deeply discounted alcohol in supermarkets and other stores and I am absolutely determined that we will deal with this.


"We published proposals, we are looking at the consultation and the results to those proposals, but be in no doubt, we've got to deal with the problem of having 20p or 25p cans of lager available in supermarkets. It's got to change."


Earlier Wollaston told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I feel devastated. We know that whenever alcohol's too cheap, people die. If the chancellor wants a message from me, it's that we are already paying a huge amount to clean up the costs of this … This policy is about getting rid of the alcohol that's being retailed around 22p a unit, that's the alcohol that's killing people and causing carnage."


Fellow Conservative Tracey Crouch also expressed anger at the retreat and their concerns were echoed by the British Medical Association (BMA).


Asked what the BMA's message would be to the prime minister, Dr Vivienne Nathanson, the body's director of professional activities, told the Today programme: "Be courageous: this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to save lives, to save the country money. Both of those are very good deals for him.


"And it will get him the thanks of an awful lot of people. Not just doctors and nurses but also the families of problem drinkers who desperately want the government to do something to help them help the people they love to kick the habit and to save their lives."


She said that having previously expressed his enthusiasm for the policy, for David Cameron to backtrack now would be "bizarre".


The government has argued that introducing a minimum unit price would help reduce the levels of ill-health and crime related to alcohol and prevent practices such as "pre-loading", where people binge-drink before going out.


Research has suggested a 45p minimum price could reduce drinking by 4.3%, potentially saving 2,000 lives within a decade. This was why the idea had such strong backing from the medical profession.


May, the former health secretary Andrew Lansley, and the education secretary, Michael Gove, have opposed the proposals on grounds that the impact on living standards would be unacceptable.


Former shadow home secretary David Davis claimed that evidence in Europe, where alcohol was cheaper but consumption lower, showed that culture was more important than price.


He described minimum pricing as a "blunderbuss" of a policy that would punish people indiscriminately. "There's a drinking divide in Britain, a culture divide and you won't solve it by this rather heavy handed mass effect," he told the Today programme.


Welcoming the news, Miles Beale, chief executive of the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, made the same arguments. "Minimum unit pricing would penalise responsible drinkers and treat everyone who is looking for value in their shopping as a binge-drinker," he said. "Evidence has also shown it will do little to tackle problem drinking."


The shadow home office minister, Diana Johnson, accused the government of "weak leadership and weak government".


She said: "The home secretary and the prime minister said this measure would cut crime and prevent alcohol abuse. What's changed?


"Both times the government announced this measure we made clear there needs to be a package around alcohol abuse, a minimum price is not a magic bullet.


"And there needs to be a clear plan to prevent a windfall for supermarkets. Both times the government insisted a minimum price was the only way forward. Theresa May has taken her eye off the ball recently. On a flagship policy this is a humiliating climbdown."







guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds






via The Guardian World News http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/mar/13/minimum-alcohol-price-cameron-fudge

Deputy PM's son Antonio gains place at prestigious London Oratory school in Fulham within catchment area of Putney home


Nick Clegg is to send his oldest son Antonio to the Catholic London Oratory school in west London, a state school.


Clegg's family live in Putney and the London Oratory in Fulham is in the catchment area.


Clegg is himself an atheist but his wife Miriam is a devout Catholic, and Antonio has been attending a Catholic primary school .


Tony Blair also sent his son Euan to the London Oratory from Islington in what was seen as a snub to north London secondary schools.


Parents were given offers by secondary schools at the weekend, and there will be relief in the Clegg household that their son made it to one of the most prestigious and highly regarded secondary schools in London. He will start in September.


The sixth form is co-educational, and the school has a reputation for favouring discipline and streaming according to ability.


A spokesman for the deputy prime minister said: "In response to media inquiries, Nick and Miriam can confirm that they have decided to send their oldest son, Antonio, from September onwards to the London Oratory school, a state Catholic secondary school.


"He is currently a pupil at a state Catholic primary school, Our Lady of the Victories in Putney, where he has been going for the last six years.


"Now that their decision has been made public, they hope that the privacy of their son will be respected."


Clegg himself attended Westminster school, a private school, and openly said he faced a dilemma about his children's education, promising that he would make the decision about their education on the basis of what was best for them.






guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds










via The Guardian World News http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/mar/04/nick-clegg-son-catholic-state-school

Coalition tensions rise as Lib Dem president Tim Farron joins move to 'maintain pressure on the government' on energy


A new Tory-Liberal Democrat flashpoint has emerged with senior Liberal Democrats revealing their intention to join a cross-party rebellion to demand a quickly established decarbonisation target for the power sector.


The rebellion is expected in a key Commons vote this month with the Liberal Democrat president Tim Farron indicating he will back the move, vowing he will "maintain the pressure on the government as best he can".


Such a move will be interpreted as a sign of the Liberal Democrat's growing confidence in the coalition and willingness to make their mark in the wake of victory over the Tories in the Eastleigh byelection.


The plan will infuriate Conservative government members who believed they had a deal with the Liberal Democrats to defer a decision on green targets in the power sector until after the election. Other Lib Dems have also said they will join the rebellion.


Farron's move in a letter to a constituent released at the weekend came as the IPPR thinktank published new research showing the proposed decarbonisation target need not increase energy prices, and the government's alternative of relying on gas will boost bills by as much as £15. IPPR said energy savings would be relatively small per household, but key advantage would be to reduce price volatility.


Environment group Friends of the Earth said: "It is great to see Tim Farron stepping up to support what is Lib Dem policy. It is hoped other backbenchers follow his lead."


The battle over the target has the potential to be one of the most bitter within government and will come in the form of an amendment tabled by Tim Yeo, the Conservative chairman of the energy select committee. Yeo has already been the subject of highly personalised attacks claiming he is merging his business interests with his politics.


The Tory right are determined to portray the green movement as indifferent to energy bills of cash-strapped consumers.


The amendment to the energy bill would require the target to be set next year, and has gained the support of three prominent Liberal Democrat MPs: Julian Huppert, Martin Horwood and John Hemming.


The move will increase pressure on Nick Clegg to give his MPs a free vote on the issue, something normally confined to issues of conscience.


Yeo has insisted: "This is a cross-party effort to ensure there is no delay in setting a carbon intensity target for electricity generation in 2030. The swift introduction of a target, in accordance with the advice of the committee on climate change, will help bolster confidence and attract investment in the UK's low-carbon supply chain and secure jobs in the industry."


Last year's Lib Dem conference under the leadership of the Treasury chief secretary Danny Alexander overwhelmingly backed the setting of a decarbonisation target, but the energy secretary Ed Davey was forced to defer the proposal as part of his wider negotiations over green energy, including a £7.6bn-per-year Treasury commitment to provide green subsidies.


The newly elected Lib Dem MP for Eastleigh, Mike Thornton, will be under pressure to support the amendment and show he has the same green credentials as his constituency predecessor Chris Huhne.


Instead of a target, the energy bill includes a clause that would require the government to make a decision on whether or not to set a decarbonisation target in 2016 at the same time as binding emission targets are set for 2030 through the next carbon budget.


IPPR says a carbon target for the energy sector would save the economy £163m if gas prices rise in line with expectations, or £249m if gas prices are higher than expected. However, relying more on gas up to 2030 by building more gas-fired power stations would cost £312m or £478m if gas prices are higher than expected – between £10-15 per household.


Will Straw, IPPR Associate director said IPPR's analysis shows not only would energy prices be more expensive, they would be highly volatile. At the government's upper estimate for gas generation in 2030, energy costs could vary by as much as £229 per household. At the lower estimate, energy costs are only likely to vary by around £51 per household.






guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds










via The Guardian World News http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/mar/03/liberal-democrats-rebellion-decarbonisation-targets-energy

Vince Cable dismisses net worth or 'jewellery' tax as 'wacky', but says party will also consider backing Labour's mansion tax plans


The Liberal Democrats are considering a mansion "super tax" that would cover all property assets including second homes in a policy consultation due to be put before the party's spring conference next month.


The business secretary, Vince Cable, said, however, that proposals also contained in the party's consultation for a net wealth tax, branded a "jewellery tax" by the Mail on Sunday were "wacky" and "completely impractical" and would not be pursued.


Cable added he was prepared to see what form of mansion tax Labour was considering before deciding whether or not to back proposals Ed Miliband first aired last week.


Labour has said it will table a Commons motion on a mansion tax, after throwing the party's weight behind such a measure last week. The issue is unlikely, however, to come to a vote in the Commons before the Eastleigh byelection on 28 February.


Cable said his party's stance would depend on how Labour phrased the motion. "If it's purely a statement of support to the principle of the mansion tax, I'm sure my colleagues would want to support it. But very often in these opposition days they can't resist the temptation to make party political point scoring and dragging other issues in like the 10p rate. If that happens I'm sure we will not. It's up to them to be statesmanlike and sensible in how they approach it."


The Lib Dem consultation paper forms part of the party's internal policy-making, and though the process is incomplete it will provide the Conservatives with ammunition in the Eastleigh byelection campaign as the Tories try to portray their coalition partners as a tax and spend party.


The paper is probably more significant in showing that the Lib Dems are still to finalise their plans for a mansion tax, asking whether it should be levied on property or the value of undeveloped land.


The paper says: "If successfully designed this would ensure taxpayers with multiple properties would be liable for a mansion tax on the cumulative value of their holdings above £2m."


That would mean that those who have invested in buy-to-let property could be liable for the tax, even if none of their properties individually was worth more than £2m.


The reference to jewellery comes in a passage considering the virtues of a French-style net wealth tax that would require taxpayers to conduct a self-assessment of their net worth. The paper concludes this would be " difficult to administer, and might have to include tax inspectors visiting homes to ascertain whether assets had been correctly valued.


The paper notes that a net wealth tax would target a similar group to a mansion tax, and overall seems unenthusiastic about the plan.


Speaking on Sky News, Cable was more blunt. "Taxing jewellery is completely impractical and intrusive … it's wacky … these ideas are not party policy."


The paper considers a wide range of revenue-raising measures, including:


• restricting relief on pensions further from £40,000 to £30,000 and lowering the lifetime allowance from £1.25m to £1m


• a land value tax designed to dampen property prices, including a holding charge for owners of under-used sites


• council tax reform so that the upper band does more to differentiate between properties in the £320,000 to £100m price range


• imposing sunset clauses on all tax relief


• extending national insurance contributions (NICs) to benefits in kind, so clamping down on so called "salary sacrifice schemes"


• introducing NICs on pensioners' earned income, and extending the period during which gifts can be paid to reduce inheritance tax to 15 years.


The paper also considers raising the tax-free personal allowance to £12,000, the level of full-time work on the minimum wage.


It proposes measures to clamp down on the use of excessive debt to fund business growth by changing the treatment of interest payments, and restricting the ability of businesses to offset losses in previous years against profits in the current year to reduce their tax bill.


The consultation rejects raising the 45p income tax rate, saying the current structure of income tax is broadly progressive.






guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds






via The Guardian World News http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/17/lib-dems-mansion-super-tax-second-homes

PM also calls for focus on education during visit to school with Liberian president ahead of role co-chairing UN poverty meeting


David Cameron has called for the next wave of international development targets to focus on extreme rather than relative poverty. The dispute about poverty targets is one of a set of differences due to be thrashed out at a UN high-level meeting on the next millennium development goals after 2015.


Cameron is co-chair of the panel that is meeting in Monrovia, Liberia.


Before the start of the panel on Friday, Cameron went to a local school with Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, the charismatic 74-year-old Liberian president. The children told them they needed books and computers. Cameron then asked what they wanted to be when they became adults and many replied doctors or lawyers. Cameron joked: "That is very impressive. In my country, they all want to be footballers or pop stars," before adding that was not fair.


The children had written a welcome sign for their two special guests in chalk on the blackboard in their dark and crowded classroom. Cameron told the children he would like world poverty goals to include higher quality education.


In interviews he insisted bolstering security and civil structures was crucial, alongside aid measures.


Speaking to reporters on Friday morning, Cameron said: "Liberia is a country that was absolutely devastated by conflict and civil war.


"It is now recovering but there is still desperate poverty. I think it is very important we keep a focus on eradicating extreme poverty.


"Here in Liberia, one in 10 children do not make it to the age of five. But I also think it is important we look at those things that keep countries poor. Conflict, corruption, lack of justice, lack of the rule of law. These things matter, as well as money."


The premier was forced to concede on Thursday that the defence budget could face more cuts in 2015-16, while the international development budget is protected.


Cameron is also pressing for new goals not to focus only on the number of children in school, but also the quality of education.






guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds






via The Guardian World News http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/feb/01/david-cameron-liberia-poverty-talks