Showing posts with label Denis Campbell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Denis Campbell. Show all posts

Health secretary's renewed attack on NHS warns that the 'weeds of failure grow more quickly in a garden of mediocrity'


Jeremy Hunt has renewed his criticism of NHS care and culture by warning that the service's tolerance of "mediocrity" could result in another Mid Staffs scandal.


The health secretary attacked what he said was hospitals' reluctance to drive up the standard of care they provide and refusal to seek patients' views on how they have been treated.


Risking alienating NHS staff with another strongly worded denunciation of the service, he said that too many hospitals represented "a garden of mediocrity", the "weeds" from which risked patients being neglected and put at risk, as at Stafford hospital. The service should be seeking "universal excellence" to match the universal access it provides, he argued.


"The NHS was set up 65 years ago not just to deliver universal equity, but universal excellence. It has been much better at delivering the former than the latter – but if it is to live up to its founding ideas it needs to deliver both," Hunt told a gathering of NHS leaders.


"So my question today is this: we celebrate excellence. We criticise failure. But do we do enough to challenge mediocrity? Because left unchallenged, it becomes entrenched, part of the culture," he added.


"And that is precisely the moment of greatest danger if we are to prevent the next Mid Staffs. The weeds of failure grow more quickly in a garden of mediocrity."


He lauded the NHS for making the UK the best place in the world to be ill for the poor and socially disadvantaged and for having "enriched" last year's Olympic Games through Danny Boyle's celebration of the service in the event's opening ceremony – a feature which Hunt reputedly tried to have removed or watered down when told about it in advance, when he was still the culture secretary.


But without every part of the NHS pursuing excellence, Mid Staffs public inquiry chairman Robert Francis QC's call for a radical overhaul in how it works and its attitude to patients would not be fulfilled, he said.


"Unless we create a climate of excellence in the parts of the NHS that are neither good nor bad, we will fail to address the cultural challenge that Robert Francis describes," said Hunt. Striving for routine excellence must be a key part of how the NHS responds to Francis's landmark report last month into how between 400 and 1,200 patients died at Stafford hospital because of poor care between 2005 and 2009.






guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds






via The Guardian World News http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/mar/08/jeremy-hunt-nhs-mediocrity-mid-staffs

Report into scandal makes 290 recommendations to ensure patients' interests become top priority for NHS


Hospital staff and managers should face prosecution if patients are harmed or killed as a result of poor care as part of sweeping changes to finally end the NHS's neglect of patient safety, the landmark report into the Mid Staffordshire scandal has recommended.


The report by Robert Francis QC, who chaired the 31-month public inquiry into the scandal, amounted to a damning indictment of NHS attitudes, practices and organisations.


Francis made no fewer than 290 recommendations, which he said were designed to ensure that patients' interests became the top priority for the NHS and that in future any lapses in care standards are detected and stopped right away, unlike at Stafford hospital.


David Cameron will deliver the government's response later on Wednesday. Ministers will now have to contemplate further changes to the NHS's system of regulation – which Francis has found to be seriously wanting – and monitoring of hospitals.


An estimated 400-1,200 patients are believed to have died between January 2005 and March 2009 as a result of poor care at Stafford in one of the biggest NHS scandals.


While the hospital trust itself bore most of the responsibility for allowing "appalling suffering of many patients" to go unchecked between 2005 and 2009, multiple failures by a wide array of organisations and individuals across "the NHS system" allowed poor care to persist and meant opportunities to intervene were not taken, Francis said.


Patients were left at risk at the hospital even after the then NHS regulator sounded the alarm about unusually high death rates there, he added. Checks and balances designed to protect patients did not prevent "serious systemic failure of this sort",


In a scathing assessment of the trust's board of directors he accused it of "a serious failure" of its duties: "It did not listen sufficiently to its patients and staff or ensure the correction of deficiencies brought to the trust's attention. [It also] failed to tackle an insidious negative culture involving a tolerance of poor standards and a disengagement from management and leadership responsibilities."


But he also cited the hospital A&E unit's need to treat 98% of patients arriving there within four hours to meet the government's key NHS targets, the trust's attempts to balance its books and its "seeking foundation trust status … at the cost of delivering acceptable standards of care" as contributory factors.


Francis said that in future the NHS should have a relentless focus on fundamental standards of care which, if breached, should lead to serious sanctions.


"Any service or part of a service that does not consistently fulfil the relevant fundamental standards should not be permitted to continue," Francis said, in a move which could see hospital units where concerns arise shut down.


In addition, "non-compliance with a fundamental standard leading to death or serious harm of a patient should be capable of being prosecuted as a criminal offence, unless the provider or individual concerned can show that it as not reasonably practical to avoid this", he recommended.


He also recommended the creation of in effect one new super-regulator for the NHS to scrutinise both clinical and financial standards. Those tasks are currently performed separately by two watchdogs, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), which regulates care, and Monitor, which regulates semi-independent foundation trust hospitals and is due to become the NHS in England's overall financial regulator in April.






guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds






via The Guardian World News http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/feb/06/mid-staffordshire-report-sweeing-changes